Evolutionary dynamics of adult stem cells: Comparison of random and immortal-strand segregation mechanisms

Emmanuel Tannenbaum, James L. Sherley, and Eugene I. Shakhnovich
Phys. Rev. E 71, 041914 – Published 27 April 2005

Abstract

This paper develops a point-mutation model describing the evolutionary dynamics of a population of adult stem cells. Such a model may prove useful for quantitative studies of tissue aging and the emergence of cancer. We consider two modes of chromosome segregation: (1) random segregation, where the daughter chromosomes of a given parent chromosome segregate randomly into the stem cell and its differentiating sister cell and (2) “immortal DNA strand” co-segregation, for which the stem cell retains the daughter chromosomes with the oldest parent strands. Immortal strand co-segregation is a mechanism, originally proposed by [Cairns Nature (London) 255, 197 (1975)], by which stem cells preserve the integrity of their genomes. For random segregation, we develop an ordered strand pair formulation of the dynamics, analogous to the ordered strand pair formalism developed for quasispecies dynamics involving semiconservative replication with imperfect lesion repair (in this context, lesion repair is taken to mean repair of postreplication base-pair mismatches). Interestingly, a similar formulation is possible with immortal strand co-segregation, despite the fact that this segregation mechanism is age dependent. From our model we are able to mathematically show that, when lesion repair is imperfect, then immortal strand co-segregation leads to better preservation of the stem cell lineage than random chromosome segregation. Furthermore, our model allows us to estimate the optimal lesion repair efficiency for preserving an adult stem cell population for a given period of time. For human stem cells, we obtain that mispaired bases still present after replication and cell division should be left untouched, to avoid potentially fixing a mutation in both DNA strands.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 28 November 2004

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.041914

©2005 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Emmanuel Tannenbaum*

  • Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

James L. Sherley

  • Biological Engineering Division, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

Eugene I. Shakhnovich

  • Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

  • *Electronic address: etannenb@fas.harvard.edu
  • Electronic address: jsherley@mit.edu
  • Electronic address: eugene@belok.harvard.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 71, Iss. 4 — April 2005

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×