Dynamics of the minimally frustrated helices determine the hierarchical folding of small helical proteins

M. Compiani, E. Capriotti, and R. Casadio
Phys. Rev. E 69, 051905 – Published 12 May 2004

Abstract

In this paper we aim at determining the key residues of small helical proteins in order to build up reduced models of the folding dynamics. We start by arguing that the folding process can be dissected into concurrent fast and slow dynamics. The fast events are the quasiautonomous coil-to-helix transitions occurring in the minimally frustrated initiation sites of folding in the early stages of the process. The slow processes consist in the docking of the fluctuating helices formed in these critical sites. We show that a neural network devised to predict native secondary structures from sequence can be used to estimate the probabilities of formation of these helical traits as they are embedded in the protein. The resulting probabilities are shown to correlate well with the experimental helicities measured in the same isolated peptides. The relevance of this finding to the hierarchical character of folding is confirmed within the framework of a diffusion-collision-like mechanism. We demonstrate that thermodynamic and topological features of these critical helices allow accurate estimation of the folding times of five proteins that have been kinetically studied. This suggests that these critical helices determine the fundamental events of the whole folding process. A remarkable feature of our model is that not all of the native helices are eligible as critical helices, whereas the whole set of the native helices has been used so far in other reconstructions of the folding mechanism. This stresses that the minimally frustrated helices of these helical proteins comprise the minimal set of determinants of the folding process.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 3 October 2003

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.051905

©2004 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

M. Compiani1,2, E. Capriotti2,3, and R. Casadio2,4

  • 1Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
  • 2CIRB, Centro Interdipartimentale per la Ricerca Biotecnologica, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 4Department of Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 69, Iss. 5 — May 2004

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×