f(R) gravity theories in Palatini formalism: Cosmological dynamics and observational constraints

Stéphane Fay, Reza Tavakol, and Shinji Tsujikawa
Phys. Rev. D 75, 063509 – Published 16 March 2007

Abstract

We make a systematic study of the cosmological dynamics for a number of f(R) gravity theories in Palatini formalism, using phase space analysis as well as numerical simulations. Considering homogeneous and isotropic models, we find a number of interesting results: (i) models based on theories of the type (a) f(R)=Rβ/Rn and (b) f(R)=R+αlnRβ, unlike the metric formalism, are capable of producing the sequence of radiation-dominated, matter-dominated, and de Sitter periods, and (ii) models based on theories of the type (c) f(R)=R+αRmβ/Rn can produce early as well as late accelerating phases but an early inflationary epoch does not seem to be compatible with the presence of a subsequent radiation-dominated era. Thus, for the classes of models considered here, we have been unable to find the sequence of all four dynamical epochs required to account for the complete cosmological dynamics, even though three out of four phases are possible. We also place observational constraints on these models using the recently released supernovae data by the Supernova Legacy Survey as well as the baryon acoustic oscillation peak in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey luminous red galaxy sample and the cosmic microwave background shift parameter. The best-fit values are found to be n=0.027, β=4.63 for the models based on (a) and α=0.11, β=4.62 for the models based on (b), neither of which are significantly preferred over the ΛCDM model. Moreover, the logarithmic term alone is not capable of explaining the late acceleration. The models based on (c) are also consistent with the data with suitable choices of their parameters. We also find that some of the models for which the radiation-dominated epoch is absent prior to the matter-dominated era also fit the data. The reason for this apparent contradiction is that the combination of the data considered here does not place stringent enough constraints on the cosmological evolution prior to the decoupling epoch, which highlights the importance of our combined theoretical-observational approach to constrain models.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 23 January 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.063509

©2007 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Stéphane Fay1,2,* and Reza Tavakol1,†

  • 1School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
  • 2Laboratoire Univers et Théories (LUTH), UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris, F-92195 Meudon Cedex, France

Shinji Tsujikawa

  • Department of Physics, Gunma National College of Technology, Gunma 371-8530, Japan

  • *Electronic address: steph.fay@gmail.com
  • Electronic address: r.tavakol@qmul.ac.uk
  • Electronic address: shinji@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 75, Iss. 6 — 15 March 2007

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×