Matched filtering of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Computational cost and template placement

Benjamin J. Owen and B. S. Sathyaprakash
Phys. Rev. D 60, 022002 – Published 22 June 1999
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

We estimate the number of templates, computational power, and storage required for a one-step matched filtering search for gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries. Our estimates for the one-step search strategy should serve as benchmarks for the evaluation of more sophisticated strategies such as hierarchical searches. We use a discrete family of two-parameter wave form templates based on the second post-Newtonian approximation for binaries composed of nonspinning compact bodies in circular orbits. We present estimates for all of the large- and mid-scale interferometers now under construction: LIGO (three configurations), VIRGO, GEO600, and TAMA. To search for binaries with components more massive than mmin=0.2M while losing no more than 10% of events due to coarseness of template spacing, the initial LIGO interferometers will require about 1.0×1011 flops (floating point operations per second) for data analysis to keep up with data acquisition. This is several times higher than estimated in previous work by Owen, in part because of the improved family of templates and in part because we use more realistic (higher) sampling rates. Enhanced LIGO, GEO600, and TAMA will require computational power similar to initial LIGO. Advanced LIGO will require 7.8×1011 flops, and VIRGO will require 4.8×1012 flops to take full advantage of its broad target noise spectrum. If the templates are stored rather than generated as needed, storage requirements range from 1.5×1011 real numbers for TAMA to 6.2×1014 for VIRGO. The computational power required scales roughly as mmin8/3 and the storage as mmin13/3. Since these scalings are perturbed by the curvature of the parameter space at second post-Newtonian order, we also provide estimates for a search with mmin=1M. Finally, we sketch and discuss an algorithm for placing the templates in the parameter space.

  • Received 27 August 1998

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.022002

©1999 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Benjamin J. Owen

  • Theoretical Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Max Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert Einstein Institut), Am Mühlenberg 5, 14476 Golm, Germany

B. S. Sathyaprakash

  • Theoretical Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF2 3YB, United Kingdom

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 60, Iss. 2 — 15 July 1999

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×