High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions

Michael Boyle, Duncan A. Brown, Lawrence E. Kidder, Abdul H. Mroué, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Mark A. Scheel, Gregory B. Cook, and Saul A. Teukolsky
Phys. Rev. D 76, 124038 – Published 27 December 2007

Abstract

Numerical simulations of 15 orbits of an equal-mass binary black-hole system are presented. Gravitational waveforms from these simulations, covering more than 30 cycles and ending about 1.5 cycles before merger, are compared with those from quasicircular zero-spin post-Newtonian (PN) formulae. The cumulative phase uncertainty of these comparisons is about 0.05 radians, dominated by effects arising from the small residual spins of the black holes and the small residual orbital eccentricity in the simulations. Matching numerical results to PN waveforms early in the run yields excellent agreement (within 0.05 radians) over the first 15 cycles, thus validating the numerical simulation and establishing a regime where PN theory is accurate. In the last 15 cycles to merger, however, generic time-domain Taylor approximants build up phase differences of several radians. But, apparently by coincidence, one specific post-Newtonian approximant, TaylorT4 at 3.5PN order, agrees much better with the numerical simulations, with accumulated phase differences of less than 0.05 radians over the 30-cycle waveform. Gravitational-wave amplitude comparisons are also done between numerical simulations and post-Newtonian, and the agreement depends on the post-Newtonian order of the amplitude expansion: the amplitude difference is about 6%–7% for zeroth order and becomes smaller for increasing order. A newly derived 3.0PN amplitude correction improves agreement significantly (<1% amplitude difference throughout most of the run, increasing to 4% near merger) over the previously known 2.5PN amplitude terms.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
17 More
  • Received 30 September 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.124038

©2007 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Michael Boyle1, Duncan A. Brown1,2,3, Lawrence E. Kidder4, Abdul H. Mroué4, Harald P. Pfeiffer1, Mark A. Scheel1, Gregory B. Cook5, and Saul A. Teukolsky4

  • 1Theoretical Astrophysics 130-33, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 2LIGO Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 13244, USA
  • 4Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA
  • 5Department of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 76, Iss. 12 — 15 December 2007

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×