Reply to “Comment on ’The evidence for a pentaquark signal and kinematic reflections’”

A. R. Dzierba, D. Krop, M. Swat, S. Teige, and A. P. Szczepaniak
Phys. Rev. D 71, 098502 – Published 31 May 2005

Abstract

The quantitative aspects of the model used, together with kinematic reflections to explain the K+n spectrum in K+K photoproduction on deuterium, were recently criticized. Here we respond to these criticisms.

  • Received 13 April 2005

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.098502

©2005 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. R. Dzierba, D. Krop, M. Swat, and S. Teige

  • Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA

A. P. Szczepaniak

  • Department of Physics and Nuclear Theory Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA

Comments & Replies

Comment on “The evidence for a pentaquark signal and kinematic reflections”

K. Hicks, V. Burkert, A. E. Kudryavtsev, I. I. Strakovsky, and S. Stepanyan
Phys. Rev. D 71, 098501 (2005)

See Also

The evidence for a pentaquark signal and kinematic reflections

A. R. Dzierba, D. Krop, M. Swat, S. Teige, and A. P. Szczepaniak
Phys. Rev. D 69, 051901(R) (2004)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 71, Iss. 9 — 1 May 2005

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×