Tracking the phase-transition energy in the disassembly of hot nuclei

C. B. Das, S. Das Gupta, L. Beaulieu, T. Lefort, K. Kwiatkowski, V. E. Viola, S. J. Yennello, L. Pienkowski, R. G. Korteling, and H. Breuer
Phys. Rev. C 66, 044602 – Published 7 October 2002
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

In efforts to determine phase transitions in the disintegration of highly excited heavy nuclei, a popular practice is to parametrize the yields of isotopes as a function of temperature in the form Y(z)=zτf(zσ(TT0)), where Y(z)’s are the measured yields and τ, σ, and T0 are fitted to the yields. Here T0 would be interpreted as the phase transition temperature. For finite systems such as those obtained in nuclear collisions, this parametrization is only approximate and hence allows for extraction of T0 in more than one way. In this work we look in detail at how values of T0 differ, depending on methods of extraction. It should be mentioned that for finite systems, this approximate parametrization works not only at the critical point, but also for first-order phase transitions (at least in some models). Thus the approximate fit is no guarantee that one is seeing a critical phenomenon. A different but more conventional search for the nuclear phase transition would look for a maximum in the specific heat as a function of temperature T2. In this case T2 is interpreted as the phase transition temperature. Ideally T0 and T2 would coincide. We invesigate this possibility, both in theory and from the ISiS data, performing both canonical (T) and microcanonical (e=E*/A) calculations. Although more than one value of T0 can be extracted from the approximate parametrization, the work here points to the best value from among the choices. Several interesting results, seen in theoretical calculations, are borne out in experiment.

  • Received 21 June 2002

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.044602

©2002 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

C. B. Das1, S. Das Gupta1, L. Beaulieu2, T. Lefort3,*, K. Kwiatkowski3,†, V. E. Viola3, S. J. Yennello4, L. Pienkowski5, R. G. Korteling6, and H. Breuer7

  • 1Physics Department, McGill University, Montréal, Canada H3A 2T8
  • 2Department de Physique, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada G1K 7P4
  • 3Department of Chemistry and IUCF, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
  • 4Department of Chemistry and Cyclotron Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
  • 5Heavy Ion Laboratory, Warsaw University, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
  • 6Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
  • 7Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

  • *Present address: Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire de Caen, F-14050 Caen Cedex, France.
  • Present address: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 66, Iss. 4 — October 2002

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×