Phys. Rev. C 52, 1713 (1995) - Reply to ``Is large weak mixing in heavy nuclei consistent with atomic experiments?''

Reply to ‘‘Is large weak mixing in heavy nuclei consistent with atomic experiments?’’

J. J. Szymanski, J. D. Bowman, M. Leuschner, B. A. Brown, and I. C. Girit

Phys. Rev. C 52, 1713 – Published 1 September 1995

Abstract

We reply to the preceding comment.

Received 21 February 1995

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.52.1713

©1995 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. J. Szymanski, J. D. Bowman, M. Leuschner, B. A. Brown, and I. C. Girit

Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Department of Physics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540

Comments & Replies

Erratum: E2 contribution to the ${}^{8}p$ $+^{7}$ Be Coulomb dissociation cross section [Phys. Rev. C 49, 1771 (1994)]

K. Langanke and T. D. Shoppa

Phys. Rev. C 51, 2844 (1995)

Is large weak mixing in heavy nuclei consistent with atomic experiments?

V. F. Dmitriev, I. B. Khriplovich, and V. B. Telitsin

Phys. Rev. C 52, 1711 (1995)

Comment on ‘‘E2 contribution to the ${}^{8}p$ $+^{7}$ Be Coulomb dissociation cross section’’

Moshe Gai and Carlos A. Bertulani

Phys. Rev. C 52, 1706 (1995)

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘E2 contribution to the ${}^{8}p$ $+^{7}$ Be Coulomb dissociation cross section’ ’’

K. Langanke and T. D. Shoppa

Phys. Rev. C 52, 1709 (1995)

Original Article

E2 contribution to the ${}^{8}p$ $+^{7}$ Be Coulomb dissociation cross section

K. Langanke and T. D. Shoppa

Phys. Rev. C 49, R1771(R) (1994)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Issue

Vol. 52, Iss. 3 — September 1995

Reuse & Permissions

Access Options

Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C