Micro-Raman and micro-infrared spectroscopic studies of Pb- and Au-irradiated ZrSiO4: Optical properties, structural damage, and amorphization

Ming Zhang, Lynn A. Boatner, Ekhard K. H. Salje, Rodney C. Ewing, Philippe Daniel, William J. Weber, Yanwen Zhang, and Ian Farnan
Phys. Rev. B 77, 144110 – Published 22 April 2008

Abstract

The optical properties of damaged periodic and aperiodic domains created by Pb+ (280keV) and Au4+ (10MeV) implantation of zircon were studied using micro-infrared (IR) and micro-Raman spectroscopy. The Pb+ and Au4+ irradiations caused a dramatic decrease in the IR reflectivity similar to that observed for metamict natural zircon. The irradiation with 10MeV Au4+ ions (to fluences of 1×1015Au4+ionscm2) also results in the formation of an amorphized phase similar to that observed in metamict zircon. These results show that high-energy, heavy-ion irradiations provide a good simulation of the ballistic effects of the recoil nucleus of an alpha-decay event and, in both cases, the result is the creation of aperiodic domains. Additional IR and Raman features were recorded in samples irradiated with 280keV Pb+ ions (to fluences of 1×1014 and 1×1015Pb+ionscm2), indicating the formation of an irradiation-induced additional phase(s). The frequencies of the features are consistent with lead silicates, ZrO2, and SiO2. The results show that spectral features of the Au4+- and Pb+-irradiated zircon are different from those of quenched ZrSiO4 melts, and the finding further confirms that the amorphous state produced by high-energy ion irradiations is structurally different from the glassy state that results from quenching a high temperature melt. In contrast to significant changes in the frequency and width of the Raman ν3 band observed in metamict zircon, the Pb+ and Au4+ irradiations do not cause similar variations, indicating that the remaining zircon crystalline domains in irradiated samples have a crystalline structure with fewer defects than those of metamict zircon.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 10 October 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.144110

©2008 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Ming Zhang1,*, Lynn A. Boatner2, Ekhard K. H. Salje1, Rodney C. Ewing3, Philippe Daniel4, William J. Weber5, Yanwen Zhang5, and Ian Farnan1

  • 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom
  • 2Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6056, USA
  • 3Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1005, USA
  • 4Laboratoire de Physique de l’Etat Condensé (LPEC), UMR CNRS 6087, Université du Maine-Faculté des Sciences, Avenue Olivier Messiaen–72085 Le Mans Cedex 9, France
  • 5Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, USA

  • *mz10001@esc.cam.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 77, Iss. 14 — 1 April 2008

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×