Magnetization steps in Zn1xMnxO: Four largest exchange constants and single-ion anisotropy

X. Gratens, V. Bindilatti, N. F. Oliveira, Jr., Y. Shapira, S. Foner, Z. Golacki, and T. E. Haas
Phys. Rev. B 69, 125209 – Published 17 March 2004
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Magnetization steps from Mn2+ pairs in several single crystals of Zn1xMnxO (0.0056<~x<~0.030), and in one powder (x=0.029), were observed. They were used to determine the four largest exchange constants (largest J’s), and the single-ion axial anisotropy parameter D. The largest two exchange constants, J1/kB=18.2±0.5K and J1/kB=24.3±0.5K, were obtained from large peaks in the differential susceptibility, dM/dH, measured in pulsed magnetic fields H up to 500kOe. These two largest J’s are associated with the two inequivalent classes of nearest neighbors (NN’s) in the wurtzite structure. The 29% difference between J1 and J1 is substantially larger than 13% in Cd1xMnxS and 15% in Cd1xMnxSe. The pulsed-field data also indicate that, despite the direct contact between the samples and a superfluid-helium bath, substantial departures from thermal equilibrium occurred during the 7.4-ms pulse. The third- and fourth-largest J’s were determined from the magnetization M at 20 mK, measured in dc magnetic fields H up to 90 kOe. Both field orientations Hc and H[101¯0] were studied. (The [101¯0] direction is perpendicular to the c axis, [0001].) By definition, neighbors which are not NN’s are distant neighbors (DN’s). The largest DN exchange constant (third-largest overall) has the value J/kB=0.543±0.005K, and is associated with the DN at r=c. Because this is not the closest DN, this result implies that the J’s do not decrease monotonically with the distance r. The second-largest DN exchange constant (fourth-largest overall) has the value J/kB0.080K. It is associated with one of the two classes of neighbors that have a coordination number zn=12, but the evidence is insufficient for a definite unique choice. The dependence of M on the direction of H gives D/kB=0.039±0.008K, in fair agreement with 0.031K from earlier electron paramagnetic resonance work.

  • Received 8 October 2003

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.125209

©2004 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

X. Gratens, V. Bindilatti*, and N. F. Oliveira, Jr.

  • Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 66.318, 05315-970 São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Y. Shapira

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA

S. Foner

  • Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

Z. Golacki

  • Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotnikow 32/46, 02-668, Warsaw, Poland

T. E. Haas

  • Department of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA

  • *Electronic address: vbindilatti@if.usp.br
  • Electronic address: yshapira@granite.tufts.edu

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 69, Iss. 12 — 15 March 2004

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×