Charge-orbital ordering and phase separation in the two-orbital model for manganites: Roles of Jahn-Teller phononic and Coulombic interactions

Takashi Hotta, Andre Luiz Malvezzi, and Elbio Dagotto
Phys. Rev. B 62, 9432 – Published 1 October 2000
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

The main properties of realistic models for manganites are studied using analytic mean-field approximations and computational numerical methods, focusing on the two-orbital model with electrons interacting through Jahn-Teller (JT) phonons and/or Coulombic repulsions. Analyzing the model including both interactions by the combination of the mean-field approximation and the exact diagonalization method, it is argued that the spin-charge-orbital structure in the insulating phase of the purely JT-phononic model with a large Hund coupling JH is not qualitatively changed by the inclusion of the Coulomb interactions. As an important application of the present mean-field approximation, the CE-type antiferromagnetic state, the charge-stacked structure along the z axis, and (3x2r2)/(3y2r2)-type orbital ordering are successfully reproduced based on the JT-phononic model with large JH for the half-doped manganite, in agreement with recent Monte Carlo simulation results. Topological arguments and the relevance of the Heisenberg exchange among localized t2g spins explains why the inclusion of the nearest-neighbor Coulomb interaction does not destroy the charge stacking structure. It is also verified that the phase-separation tendency is observed both in purely JT-phononic (large JH) and purely Coulombic models in the vicinity of the hole undoped region, as long as realistic hopping matrices are used. This highlights the qualitative similarities of both approaches and the relevance of mixed-phase tendencies in the context of manganites. In addition, the rich and complex phase diagram of the two-orbital Coulombic model in one dimension is presented. Our results provide robust evidence that Coulombic and JT-phononic approaches to manganites are not qualitatively different ways to carry out theoretical calculations, but they share a variety of common features.

  • Received 23 February 2000

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.9432

©2000 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Takashi Hotta

  • Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan

Andre Luiz Malvezzi

  • Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Caixa Postal 473, 17.033-360, Bauru, SP, Brazil

Elbio Dagotto

  • Department of Physics and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 62, Iss. 14 — 1 October 2000

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×