Abstract
The crystal-field energy-level structures of three different -doped garnet systems are analyzed and compared in this study. The garnet hosts are (YAG), (YSAG) doped with as a sensitizer ion, and (YSGG) doped with as a sensitizer ion. The focus is on energy levels assigned to ions substituted for at dodecahedral ( symmetry) sites in the cubic garnet lattices. Analyses are carried out on experimental energy-level data that span up to 29 different multiplet manifolds (between 0 and 44 000 ) of the 4 electronic configuration. These data include the locations of 117 crystal-field levels of in YAG, 109 levels of in YSAG, and 92 levels of in YSGG.
The energy-level analyses are based on the use of a parametrized model Hamiltonian for the 4 electronic configuration of in a crystal field of symmetry. The model Hamiltonian includes both atomic (‘‘free-ion’’) and crystal-field interactions, parametrized to fit calculated eigenvalues to experimentally observed energies. The crystal-field part of the Hamiltonian is defined to include the standard one-electron interaction operators, as well as additional operators that provide a partial, phenomenological consideration of electron-correlation effects in the 4f-electron–crystal-field interactions. The latter, correlation crystal-field (CCF) interactions, are introduced to address crystal-field splittings within several J-multiplet manifolds that are poorly represented by one-electron crystal-field interaction models. Inclusion of CCF terms in the model Hamiltonian leads to dramatic improvement in the fits between calculated and observed crystal-field splittings within the problematic multiplet manifolds. All of the energy-level analyses reported in this study were carried out within commensurate parametrization schemes, and the Hamiltonian parameters derived from these analyses provide a suitable basis for comparing the 4f-electron–crystal-field interaction properties of in YAG, YSAG, and YSGG. These analyses are based entirely on experimental data that specify the locations of energy levels, but do not provide any explicit information about the angular momentum () compositions of the crystal-field wave functions.
- Received 1 June 1993
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.15561
©1993 American Physical Society