Slow isocharged sequence ions with helium collisions: Projectile core dependence

Deyang Yu, Xiaohong Cai, Rongchun Lu, Fangfang Ruan, Caojie Shao, Hongqiang Zhang, Ying Cui, Jun Lu, Xu Xu, Jianxiong Shao, Baowei Ding, Zhihu Yang, Ximeng Chen, and Zhaoyuan Liu
Phys. Rev. A 76, 022710 – Published 22 August 2007

Abstract

The collisions of the isocharged sequence ions of q=6 (C6+, N6+, O6+, F6+, Ne6+, Ar6+, and Ca6+), q=7 (F7+, Ne7+, S7+, Ar7+, and Ca7+), q=8 (F8+, Ne8+, Ar8+, and Ca8+), q=9 (F9+, Ne9+, Si9+, S9+, Ar9+, and Ca9+) and q=11 (Si11+, Ar11+, and Ca11+) with helium at the same velocities were investigated. The cross-section ratios of the double-electron transfer (DET) to the single-electron capture (SEC) σDETσSEC and the true double-electron capture (TDC) to the double-electron transfer σTDCσDET were measured. It shows that for different ions in an isocharged sequence, the experimental cross-section ratio σDETσSEC varies by a factor of 3. The results confirm that the projectile core is another dominant factor besides the charge state and the collision velocity in slow (0.350.49v0; v0 denotes the Bohr velocity) highly charged ions (HCIs) with helium collisions. The experimental cross-section ratio σDETσSEC is compared with the extended classical over-barrier model (ECBM) [A. Bárány et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 9, 397 (1985)], the molecular Coulombic barrier model (MCBM) [A. Niehaus, J. Phys. B 19, 2925 (1986)], and the semiempirical scaling laws (SSL) [N. Selberg et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, 4127 (1996)]. It also shows that the projectile core properties affect the initial capture probabilities as well as the subsequent relaxation of the projectiles. The experimental cross-section ratio σTDCσDET for those lower isocharged sequences is dramatically affected by the projectile core structure, while for those sufficiently highly isocharged sequences, the autoionization always dominates, hence the cross-section ratio σTDCσDET is always small.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 11 January 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.022710

©2007 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Deyang Yu1,*, Xiaohong Cai1,†, Rongchun Lu1,2, Fangfang Ruan1,2, Caojie Shao1, Hongqiang Zhang3, Ying Cui3, Jun Lu1, Xu Xu3, Jianxiong Shao3, Baowei Ding3, Zhihu Yang1, Ximeng Chen3, and Zhaoyuan Liu3

  • 1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, People’s Republic of China
  • 2Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
  • 3Department of Modern Physics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, People’s Republic of China

  • *d.yu@impcas.ac.cn
  • caixh@impcas.ac.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 76, Iss. 2 — August 2007

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×