Single-particle entanglement

S. J. van Enk
Phys. Rev. A 72, 064306 – Published 29 December 2005

Abstract

I give a simple argument that demonstrates that the state 01+10, with 0 denoting a state with 0 particles (or photons) and 1 a one-particle state, is entangled in spite of recent claims to the contrary. I also discuss viewpoints on the old controversy about whether the above state can be said to display single-particle or single-photon nonlocality.

  • Received 9 August 2005

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.064306

©2005 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

S. J. van Enk

  • Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 600-700 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974, USA

Comments & Replies

Reply to “Comment on ‘Single-particle entanglement’ ”

S. J. van Enk
Phys. Rev. A 74, 026302 (2006)

Comment on “Single-particle entanglement”

Aurélien Drezet
Phys. Rev. A 74, 026301 (2006)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 72, Iss. 6 — December 2005

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×