Atom lasers, coherent states, and coherence. I. Physically realizable ensembles of pure states

H. M. Wiseman and John A. Vaccaro
Phys. Rev. A 65, 043605 – Published 20 March 2002
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

A laser, be it an optical laser or an atom laser, is an open quantum system that produces a coherent beam of bosons (photons or atoms, respectively). Far above threshold, the stationary state ρss of the laser mode is a mixture of coherent-field states with random phase, or, equivalently, a Poissonian mixture of number states. This paper answers the question: can descriptions such as these, of ρss as a stationary ensemble of pure states, be physically realized? Here physical realization is as defined previously by us [H. M. Wiseman and J. A. Vaccaro, Phys. Lett. A 250, 241 (1998)]: an ensemble of pure states for a particular system can be physically realized if, without changing the dynamics of the system, an experimenter can (in principle) know at any time that the system is in one of the pure-state members of the ensemble. Such knowledge can be obtained by monitoring the baths to which the system is coupled, provided that coupling is describable by a Markovian master equation. Using a family of master equations for the (atom) laser, we solve for the physically realizable (PR) ensembles. We find that for any finite self-energy χ of the bosons in the laser mode, the coherent-state ensemble is not PR; the closest one can come to it is an ensemble of squeezed states. This is particularly relevant for atom lasers, where the self-energy arising from elastic collisions is expected to be large. By contrast, the number-state ensemble is always PR. As the self-energy χ increases, the states in the PR ensemble closest to the coherent-state ensemble become increasingly squeezed. Nevertheless, there are values of χ for which states with well-defined coherent amplitudes are PR, even though the atom laser is not coherent (in the sense of having a Bose-degenerate output). We discuss the physical significance of this anomaly in terms of conditional coherence (and hence conditional Bose degeneracy).

  • Received 30 June 1999

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.043605

©2002 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

H. M. Wiseman1,2,3,4,* and John A. Vaccaro2,4,1

  • 1School of Science, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia
  • 2Division of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia
  • 4Physics Department, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom

  • *Electronic address: h.wiseman@gu.edu.au

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 65, Iss. 4 — April 2002

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×