Reply to “Comment on ‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’ ”

Daniel T. Gillespie
Phys. Rev. A 56, 3304 – Published 1 October 1997
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

It is argued that the stochastic model of a quantum-mechanical two-state oscillator discussed in the preceding Comment by Hardy et al. [Phys. Rev. A 56, 3301 (1997)] does not constitute a valid classical stochastic process.

  • Received 24 March 1997

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.3304

©1997 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Daniel T. Gillespie

  • Computational Sciences Branch (4B4000D), Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake, California 93555

Comments & Replies

Comment on ‘‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’’

Piotr Garbaczewski and Robert Olkiewicz
Phys. Rev. A 54, 1733 (1996)

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’’’

Daniel T. Gillespie
Phys. Rev. A 54, 1737 (1996)

Comment on “Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process”

L. Hardy, D. Home, E. J. Squires, and M. A. B. Whitaker
Phys. Rev. A 56, 3301 (1997)

Original Articles

Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process

Daniel T. Gillespie
Phys. Rev. A 49, 1607 (1994)

Realism and the quantum-mechanical two-state oscillator

L. Hardy, D. Home, E. J. Squires, and M. A. B. Whitaker
Phys. Rev. A 45, 4267 (1992)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 56, Iss. 4 — October 1997

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×