Comment on ‘‘Quantum Zeno effect’’

L. E. Ballentine
Phys. Rev. A 43, 5165 – Published 1 May 1991
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

The quantum Zeno effect is not a general characteristic of continuous measurements. In a recently reported experiment [Itano et al., Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)], the inhibition of atomic excitation and deexcitation is not due to any ‘‘collapse of the wave function,’’ but instead is caused by a very strong perturbation due to the optical pulses and the coupling to the radiation field. The experiment should not be cited as providing empirical evidence in favor of the notion of ‘‘wave-function collapse.’’

  • Received 12 March 1990

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.43.5165

©1991 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

L. E. Ballentine

  • Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6

Comments & Replies

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum Zeno effect’’’

Wayne M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland
Phys. Rev. A 43, 5168 (1991)

Original Article

Quantum Zeno effect

Wayne M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland
Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 43, Iss. 9 — May 1991

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×